Skip to main content

All over the world Wind Farms are being DECOMMISSIONED


Wind farms. Such a nice sounding term, isn't it? Farm. Conjures up images of lush pasture, wooden fences and happy animals. But these developments are NOT farms. They are corporate projects, to make money and keep the mining industry booming. Farms, when they're done properly, work with nature, instead of destroying it. A wind turbine seems such a passive thing, doesn't it? Just standing there, spinning, letting the wind blow through it's blades. For free. But nothing is free. Something always pays the price. And this case its the environment, the planet and it's people. You could almost understand the greed behind it if they were supremely efficient machines, rewarding investment with megabucks returns, but all over the world wind farm operators are going out of business, especially when the government subsidies dry up.

Take Denmark, for example. 
Decouple Media have put up a very informative video: Denmark moving away from wind energy
 
Here is the blurb: Denmark is known around the world as a wind turbine superpower. It has been an early mover with the largest per capita deployments and large entities to manage fluctuating output. Denmark has implemented the world's most ambitious target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. But underlying this target is burning large amounts of biomass imported from abroad mainly the Baltics. New analysis from the Danish energy department show that biomass use exceeds international sustainability goals several times. Danish companies are now showing more interest than ever before to seek a more pragmatic and neutral stance towards nuclear power putting the Danish government in a conundrum about its anti nuclear policies. Johan Sollid, founder and chairperson of Foreningen Atomkraft Ja Tak (Nuclear Power Yes Please,) joins me to discuss Denmark’s energy quagmire and the growing support for nuclear in his country.
 
According to Betz Law, turbines are capable, because of the laws of physics, to operate at a maximum of 59.3% efficiency. And 25% of the energy produced is needed to run the internal lubrication pumps. 59.3% efficiency is because the turbine can only cope with wind of a certain strength, otherwise it shuts down. And of course, when there's no wind, it shuts down. Compared to nuclear energy, which is 99% efficient and has no wavering supply, wind energy is a complete dud.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING regarding renwable Energy Zone Burnie Tasmania

This Sunday, independent MP Craig Garland is convening a public meeting for residents and those interested in the current proposal for a mega wind farm for Northwest Tasmania. The wind farm is proposed for one of 5 Renewable Energy Zones, called REZ. The relevant Tasmanian Government website RECfit announced in July 2024 their intention to establish these zones throughout Tasmania, including one in Bass Strait, off the north coast of our island.   The problem? Despite the community requesting more detailed information about these proposals, in order to properly assess whether they actually  want them in the area, the Tasmanian Government, represented by minister Nick Duigan, has refused to meet with the community to discuss and answer their many valid questions.    Northwest Energy Impacts Independent MP and Braddon electorate representative Craig Garland has stepped up. On Sunday he will provide a venue for people living in and near the proposed zone. The meeting w...

Chemical and Thermal Pollution Impacts from Off-shore Wind Turbines

Every country that pushes wind turbines wants them off the coast, out of the way, far from view. You'd think that would be fine. Except for the THERMAL AND CHEMICAL POLLUTION. It's actually quite difficult to find accurate information about how much pollution turbines release into the ocean and the other effects on marine life. Here is part of an article written in 2021 about wind turbine effects on Lake Erie: Wind Turbine-borne contaminants Beyond disturbing the sediment for construction and transmission line installation, two additional emerging contaminants are found to be shed by operational wind turbines – bisphenol A and neodymium. Bisphenol A is the primary ingredient in industrial epoxies and is extensively used in turbine blade construction to keep the blades as lightweight as possible. Due to what is known as leading edge erosion, this chemical, a known endocrine inhibitor is damaging to reproductive health in both people and fish. Half-life in air is roug...

Central Coast Council Mayor Cheryl Fuller boldly fights back against REZ in Central north Tasmania

  The above letter was sent to Nick Duigan, the Minister for Energy & Renewables and Parks & Environment ( a conflict of interest, if ever these was one), on 1st July 2024 by the Mayor of Central Coast Council, Cheryl Fuller. This followed feedback from the Central Coast community expressing growing concerns over the wind turbine development proposed for the area.   Please note point 4: "Members of our community in properties neighbouring the proposed REZ have expressed their concerns regarding the impact of turbines on human health and wellbeing. As a key role of local government in Tasmania is to provide for the health, safety and welfare of our communities, we advocate strongly for the REZ to avoid close proximity to all residential areas."   In a bold move, Mayor Fuller acknowledges that there are harmful impacts of such a development upon human health, productivity of food growing land areas and wildlife. Please take a screenshot or download this image and sh...